Kansas NAACP Angry over Supreme Court Voting Rights Decision

The NAACP released the following statements in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act.NAACP

From Roslyn M. Brock, Chairman, NAACP National Board of Directors:
“This decision has the potential to set voting rights back more than fifty years,” stated NAACP Chairman Roslyn M. Brock. “It is especially unsettling in a year when we commemorate Medgar Evers, a man who gave his life to expand and protect the right to vote. But in the spirit of Medgar, who said ‘You can kill a man but you can’t kill an idea,’ we will stand our ground and bring this debate to Congress.”

From Benjamin Todd Jealous, President and CEO, NAACP:
“This decision is outrageous. The Court’s majority put politics over decades of precedent and the rights of voters,” stated NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous. “Congress must resurrect its bipartisan efforts from 2006 to ensure that the federal government has the power to preemptively strike racially discriminatory voting laws. Without that power, we are more vulnerable to the flood of attacks we have seen in recent years.”
Jealous continued, “While Section 2 is powerful after the fact, we must have a tool to protect against stolen elections proactively.”

From Jotaka Eaddy, Sr. Director for Voting Rights, NAACP:
“Today’s decision puts Congress in the center of the battle for voting rights in our nation,” said Jotaka Eaddy, NAACP Senior Director for Voting Rights. “While the Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate section 4 is a setback, it is not the end of the fight. It is time for all Americans to take this fight to Congress and ensure that every vote is protected. Our democracy demands it.”

From Kim Keenan, General Counsel, NAACP:
“The Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby sets the stage for a fight to ensure that people of color are not turned away from the ballot box using modern pretextual devices like photo identification,” stated Kim Keenan, NAACP General Counsel. “Section 5 is the reason why minority voting is up. Until we demand a fix for this problem, equal rights under the law and a fair vote will be no more than a promise to millions of voters.”
From Glenda Overstreet, President, Kansas State Conference NAACP

“The ruling of the Supreme court in Shelby County vs. Holder, stands as evidence to show that America’s fight for voting equality continues to be a necessity”, stated Kansas State Conference NAACP President, Glenda Overstreet. “It is not coincidental that the decision to invalidate Section 4, a coverage section that determines which states and local governments fall under the Section 5 pre-clearance rules, was made during a time when States across America have taken on patterns of regression by introducing and approving additional voter identification requirements. Progress takes consistent action and relative to that, we will not be deterred.”
On February 27th, 2013, the NAACP and thousands of activists from across the country rallied outside of the Supreme Court to urge the Supreme Court to protect voting rights for all citizens and uphold Section 5.

  • Racism?

    Why is that it is OK for some races to react negatively to things on the local, state, or national level, and expect others to not be offended.

    I think I am going to start my own organization. It is going to be NAAWP
    (National Association for the Advancement of White People)

    Or wait would that be racist?

  • Exactly

    I am also going to create an all white college and White Entertainment Television.